Search This Blog

Showing posts with label management styles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label management styles. Show all posts

Thursday, January 3, 2013

14 Managing without Inducing Fear

This lecture introduces a better way to manage than blaming people for the manager’s problems.
Every manager has problems and there is a right and wrong way to react to them. The wrong way is to see people as the cause of the problems and expressing negativity. The right way is to treat problems as the food for improvements; cost reductions and productivity increases. If you are reacting the wrong way then the corrective actions are first, practice and reinforce for others “not expressing negativity”, and second, involve your people in process improvement. If your organization is already involved in a quality improvement program, such as Six Sigma, then you should know how to involve your people in process improvement. If not then work on the first step for now and we will get to process improvement training later.
To understand why blaming people is wrong and improving processes is right we need to review what is called the “85/15 rule”. This is one of those rules that have resulted from the experience of many managers over a long time and is a fundamental basis for process improvement efforts. This rule says that 85% of problems are due to the system, not the people in the system. Therefore managers that blame people for problems are wrong 85% of the time. This induces fear and lowers the organization’s effectiveness. Managers that blame the system and attempt to improve the system are right 85% of the time; an excellent “batting average” in problem solving for managers. Remember that the system is the manager’s responsibility even though workers may own the process involved. Only after there is a fully trained, empowered and experienced workforce can the manager relinquish some responsibility for improving the system.
A way to test how well you are progressing in handling problems is to evaluate your degree of enlightenment as a manager when problems arise. The higher you are on the following list the higher your enlightenment is in reacting to problems.
        Changes system (high enlightenment)
        Blames no one
        Blames himself or herself
        Blames other(s) (low enlightenment)
The flow chart in figure 5 below shows that if a manager reacts properly the reaction creates a positive feedback, making it easier to handle future problems.
 Figure 5. A process for managing problems without inducing fear in individual contributors.
An effective manager follows the process outlined in Figure 5 when problems occur. First the manager avoids blaming people, i.e. expressing negativity, and instead questions whether the system needs to be changed. Even if the problem arose due to a mistake of a worker the manager should question whether the system can be changed so that the same mistake won’t happen again or so that the workers job is easier and less prone to result in mistakes. Typically, the problem is associated with a process owned by a subordinate so the manager should seek help and information from the subordinate. The details and tools associated with process improvement are covered later but it is always better to have the process owner involved in changing the process than having a manager do the work. Effective process improvement focuses on the process, not the people, and bases decisions on data rather than gut feel or intuition if at all possible.
The process described in Figure 5 results in happier workers because they don’t get blamed for problems and managers demonstrate that they care enough to get involved and help fix the system. This builds respect for managers, commitment to organizations and improves motivation of workers.

Exercise

1.     Review problems faced in your organization over the past few months
2.     Try to recall if you expressed any form of negativity. Think of specific incidents where:
a.      You blamed people for a problem that may have been a system problem
b.     You blamed the boss
c.      You blamed yourself
3.     Write down a better way you could have handled each incident
4.     Now review the corrections to your action plan that you made after Lecture 13. Does your plan include changing your approach to problem solving in a way that raises your problem solving batting average and does not induce fear in your organization. If so proceed with implementing the changes you have added to your plan.
If your analysis says you have habits that may be inducing fear you should change your behavior. This is about the most difficult thing for anyone to do (change behavior). Changing what we do is easy in comparison to changing how we behave. First, we must be honest with ourselves and want to change. Then we must know how to change. The key at this point is to avoid inducing fear, which undermines the organizations effectiveness and our effectiveness as a manager.


If you find that the pace of blog posts isn’t compatible with the pace you  would like to maintain in studying this material you can buy the book “The Manager’s Guide for Effective Leadership” at:
or hard copy or for nook at:
or hard copy or E-book at:


Friday, November 16, 2012

9 Understanding Knowledge Workers


Knowledge workers require more attention to management style than manual workers. This lecture describes how Theory Z management style should be modified according to situations and to individual knowledge worker’s needs.
In the book cited in Lecture 8 Peter Drucker says knowledge workers are not subordinates, they are associates and they must know more about their specialties and specific jobs than their bosses. In the past manual workers were often constrained to be content to have their job, be paid a reasonable wage and treated fairly. In contrast knowledge workers are less constrained and seek those benefits plus:
•           Challenge
•           Opportunity for achievement
•           Responsibility for their work
•           Rewarding mission
Knowledge workers can set their own goals in support of the organization’s goals and participate in organizational planning and decision making. Knowledge workers make decisions affecting the organization’s results just like managers; they plan, execute and measure. They desire accountability for themselves and want poor performers removed from the organization. They desire clear career ladders in spite of today’s environment of limited opportunities for promotions. (This is true for managers, technical workers, & volunteers.)
Knowledge workers are individuals and must be managed as individuals to maximize organizational effectiveness. The effective leader of knowledge workers must recognize that knowledge workers have different strengths, weaknesses, training needs, learning styles, and values. They perform best in certain environments:
•           Big team, small team, no team
•           Highly structured environment, little structure
•           Decision maker, adviser
•           Leader, follower
They can be at different levels of Maslow’s hierarchy at different times due to both the job environment and environments outside their job. This again calls for treating them as individuals rather than as a homogeneous group of workers.
Here are some ways an effective leader can help knowledge workers manage themselves:
•     Help them know their strengths
        Don’t focus on their weaknesses until you know and recognize their strengths. As an objective observer you are be able to better assess their strengths and weaknesses than they are. If they know you understand and value their strengths then they can accept or try to improve their weaknesses without being in fear of their weaknesses.
        Ensure each is in the best environment for his or her strengths and personality
        Some are best when working by themselves, some in a team and some are best at guiding the work of others.
        Get to know them and then guide them into the proper role: Leader/follower, decision maker/advisor, etc.
        Help them keep up with their specialties and develop their career
        Fight for the budgets necessary to help specialists update their skills from time to time.
        Take time to have honest discussions of their career paths and, if you can, help them realize their goals. Don’t make promises you can’t keep. It will undermine your credibility and authority.
        Help them understand how to best communicate with their bosses and coworkers learning     styles (oral, visual, or doing)
        For example, even though you might know that the big boss is an oral learner your workers may not. Make sure you give them guidance if they are going to be briefing people they are unfamiliar with.
        Help them manage their time
        Don’t involve them in unnecessary meetings. Take time to ensure that they understand your instructions and guidelines for any new assignments. Facilitate interactions with other skilled workers whose knowledge or experience they need to utilize. Don’t ask for unnecessary reports. (More on time management later in the course.)
        Help them improve their processes using modern methods (These are defined in later       lectures)
        This means ensuring that they have the proper training, then are empowered to change their processes,  have access to all data (such as financial data) necessary to assess changes to their processes and access to any specialists, such as those skilled in statistics or other special methods of process improvement.
You may be getting the impression that being an effective leader of knowledge workers takes more time than traditional management styles. Actually it’s the reverse. The recommendations described above do take time but they enable workers to manage themselves and thereby save the manager from the constant firefighting of crises that consume most traditional managers. If you’re not convinced reread the next to the last paragraph in Lecture 2.
You should not get the impression that having trained, motivated and empowered workers free the manager from the responsibility of providing leadership. The organization’s leader must have active and intimate involvement in the main activities of the organization. The studies of Gary Lynn and Richard Reilly reported in their book Blockbusters- The Five Keys to Developing Great New Products, reveal that highly successful new products, which they call “blockbusters”, were three and one-half times more likely to have senior managers intensely involved in their development than failed product developments. Empowered workers should handle routine work without management involvement but difficult and important work needs leadership by senior managers. Moreover knowledge workers require more than one type of leadership.
Some excellent advice on managing knowledge workers is found in the popular book The One Minute Manager by Kenneth H. Blanchard and Spencer Johnson. The authors recommend that managers match their management approach to the situation and to the needs of the worker. I’ll only summarize their comments on four management approaches to be used with four different types of workers as you can benefit from reading the book.
•           Directing- Specific Instruction & Close Supervision- For Crises and Workers that are Enthusiastic Beginners
•           Coaching- Directing + Explanations, Solicitation of Suggestions & Support- For Disillusioned Learners
•           Supporting-Facilitates Subordinate’s Efforts & Shares Responsibility for Decision Making- For Reluctant Contributors
•           Delegating-Decision Making and Problem Solving Turned Over to Subordinates-For Enthusiastic Contributors that are Highly Competent & Highly Committed
Note that these authors support Drucker’s view that effective leaders must treat knowledge workers as individuals to the point of changing their management style according to the individual worker’s needs. Also the four approaches defined by Blanchard and Johnson can be viewed as variations of the basic Theory Z management style.
Exercise:
1.         Think about the last crisis in your organization. Did you adopt a “directing” style by accepting the leadership role, giving specific instructions and providing close supervision until the crisis was resolved? Or did you seek to delegate this tough task to someone else?
2.         If this crisis were to reappear rehearse how you will handle it next time.
3.         Pick six of your workers or peers and see if you can classify them as:
a.         Enthusiastic beginners
b.         Disillusioned learners
c.         Reluctant contributors
d.         Highly competent and highly committed enthusiastic contributors
4.         Think about your recent involvements with workers in each of the four categories. Did you adopt your style to the worker’s needs?  Rehearse how you will interact with these workers in your next interactions.

If you find that the pace of blog posts isn’t compatible with the pace you  would like to maintain in studying this material you can buy the book “The Manager’s Guide for Effective Leadership” at:
or hard copy or for nook at:
or hard copy or E-book at:

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

7 The Theory Z Manager


The concept of management style was introduced in Lecture 3 where Theory X, Theory Y and Theory Z styles were mentioned but not defined. Now we define and contrast them in hopes that the advantages of the Theory Z style are made clear. This lecture is short but the concepts are fundamental so do the exercise carefully. Much of the material in this brief lecture is shamelessly borrowed from Management in Action by William Hitt, See page 12.
Management styles can be grouped by the two parameters that measure a manager’s concern for productivity and for people. A convenient way to examine Theory X, Y, L and Z managers is to compare their concerns for people and productivity as shown in figure 3.
 Figure 3 Two Measures of Managers’ Style are Their Concerns for Productivity and for People
Few managers fit in the same box all the time and for all situations but examining managers with this simple approach is instructive. The Theory L manager doesn’t need discussion as it should be obvious that a manager that has little concern for either people or productivity isn’t an effective manager. A simple view of Theory X managers is that they believe workers:
•           Are lazy
•           Must be controlled and punished when things go wrong
•           Prefer to be directed
In contrast Theory Y managers believe workers:
•           Accept and seek responsibility
•           Will exercise self-direction and self-control
•           Have intellectual potentialities only partially utilized
Is either of these theories all right or all wrong? No, in fact a few workers do fit the Theory X manger’s views. However, ~95% of workers closer fit theory Y manager’s view and if saddled with a Theory X manager are likely to respond with low effectiveness (even though their productivity may appear acceptable) because their needs for safety, belongingness and self-esteem aren’t being addressed. They may even change jobs, if that option is available. This leaves the Theory X manager with more and more workers that fit the 5% description, thereby making this manager’s organization less and less effective over time.
A problem with Theory Y managers is that most workers, while fitting the Theory Y expectations in general, need leadership to perform at the level of their capability. The Theory Y manager’s lack of focus on objectives allows his people to underperform.
According to Hitt Theory Z managers have as much focus on productivity as Theory X managers but Theory Z managers believe teamwork is essential to productivity and therefore their beliefs are:
•           People are basically good
•           Treat people as persons, not objects
•           People are “works in process”, not static
•           Value individual differences
•           Value the individual as a whole person
•           Prize openness and honesty
 These beliefs lead Theory Z managers to:
•           Foster trust
•           Deal with differences of viewpoints
•           Take planned risks with people
•           Emphasize cooperation
Thinking back to the previous lecture we see that the behavior of a Theory Z manager helps workers move from left to right on Maslow’s hierarchy because their needs for safety, belongingness and self-esteem are being addressed. In time a Theory Z manager’s trust in people results in a returned trust in the manager. When mutual trust is achieved the workers are ready for being empowered by the manager to have more and more control over their work processes. If the workers are properly trained for their jobs and in process improvements techniques they can handle empowerment properly. Empowerment facilitates self-actualization and results in the highly motivated workforce needed for a highly productive organization.
Exercise
If you are familiar with well know business leaders of the past 25 years answer the following questions. If not, Google the managers mentioned below to see if you can learn their styles (X, Y, L, or Z) before answering the questions.
1.         Where would you classify Jack Welch in the ‘70’s & 80’s? in the ‘90’s?
2.       What personnel practice of Jack Welch resulted in high organizational effectiveness but introduced     competition between employees that limited the effectiveness from being as high as it could have been?
3.         Where would you classify the infamous Al “Chainsaw” Dunlap?
4.         Where is your boss?
5.         Where are you?
6.         Where would you like to be?
7.         What actions should you take to get to where you would like to be?
8.         Compare these steps to the draft plan you prepared in the previous exercise and modify your plan as you believe necessary.

If you find that the pace of blog posts isn’t compatible with the pace you  would like to maintain in studying this material you can buy the book “The Manager’s Guide for Effective Leadership” at:
or hard copy or for nook at:
or hard copy or E-book at: